DAOCouncil

Problem Statement

DAOCouncil is an innovative decentralized governance platform that combines traditional DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) voting with AI-powered deliberation. Here's a comprehensive breakdown:Core Concept:The platform facilitates structured debates on DAO proposals where human participants can discuss and AI jurors analyze and judge the arguments.Instead of relying solely on token-weighted voting (which can lead to whale dominance), decisions are influenced by the quality of arguments and AI juror deliberation.Key Components: Debate System:Each debate has a specific topic, multiple sides/positions, and assigned AI jurorsDebates are structured around concrete proposals with specific actions and funding requirementsUsers can participate by presenting arguments for different sides of the debateAI Jurors:Multiple AI jurors with distinct personas analyze the debateEach juror: -- Processes the entire conversation history -- Evaluates arguments from different sides -- Provides reasoned judgments and explanations for their decisions -- Updates their stance as the debate progressesKey Features:Debate Creation: Users can create new debates with customized action prompt that should be taken if proposal is approved.Live Deliberation: Real-time discussion with immediate AI juror feedbackStructured Arguments: Support for different stances and positions within each debateTransparent Reasoning: AI jurors provide detailed explanations for their decisionsGovernance Mechanism:Combines human input with AI analysisFocuses on argument quality over token quantityCreates a more democratic and reasoned approach to DAO governanceHelps reduce the impact of whale voting by emphasizing quality of discourseThe platform essentially creates a hybrid governance model where AI agents serve as impartial analysts of human arguments, helping to create more balanced and well-reasoned decisions in DAO governance. This approach aims to make DAO governance more accessible, fair, and focused on the merit of arguments rather than just the size of token holdings.

Solution

Here's how we built our AI-powered DAO governance system:AI Agent SystemBuilt on CDP AgentKit framework for AI juror and judge implementationIntegrated the Privy Server Wallet as a custom CDP AgentKit tool to efficiently manage multiple vaults across different debatesDeployed on Autonome Altlayer for efficient agent execution and resource managementDatabase & BackendPostgreSQL as primary databaseManages debate states and user dataHandles AI juror decisionsEnables real-time operationsSupports concurrent user sessionsFrontend StackReact + ViteTailwindCSSPrivy Wallet Modal for user wallet connectionNetworkDeployed on Base SepoliaKey Technical FeaturesCustom CDP AgentKit tools for AI decision-makingReal-time debate processing with AI jurors feedback