SwiftPeer

Problem Statement

Lack of Transparency and Trust in Review ProcessSolution: SwiftPeer ensures a transparent and trustless review process, promoting confidence in the evaluation of research papers.Potential Biases in Acceptance ProcessSolution: The decentralized architecture of SwiftPeer reduces biases, fostering an inclusive and impartial assessment of research contributions.Inefficiency and Delay in Review ProceduresSolution: Through smart contract implementation and automation, SwiftPeer accelerates the review and acceptance procedures, leading to quicker decision-making and reduced administrative burdens.Limited Access to Research PapersSolution: SwiftPeer ensures free and open-source access to research papers on the public blockchain, allowing for perpetual availability and the creation of connected graphs.Risk of Premature Leaks and Lack of ConfidentialitySolution: Researchers can upload files in encrypted form using SwiftPeer, preventing premature leaks and ensuring the confidentiality of their work.Inadequate Record-KeepingSolution: SwiftPeer employs NFT-based record-keeping, assigning a unique NFT to each submission and approval for transparent and immutable documentation.Inefficient Payment ProcessesSolution: SwiftPeer streamlines payment processes for hassle-free verification, enhancing overall efficiency in the academic and research ecosystem.Linkshttps://github.com/codewizard26/eth-f

Solution

LighthouseChallenge: Incomplete documentation, the platform needs to integrate features such as retrieving Content Identifiers (CIDs).Solution: Developed and implemented smart contracts to address the missing functionality and retrieve necessary CIDs. -ScrollsChallenge: Problem with getting the test faucet for the scroll sepoliaSolution : Bridged the sepolia eth to get scroll sepolia